Teaching Future Teachers: An Argument for Incorporating More Teaching Preparation in Business Doctoral Programs

JMEIn sharp contrast to MBA and undergraduate business programs, business doctoral programs face far fewer limitations and guidelines on program curriculum and structure. As a result, business doctoral programs can vary widely in a variety of ways, including how each program prepares students for future teaching positions. In their paper, “Isn’t It Time We Did Something About the Lack of Teaching Preparation in Business Doctoral Programs?”,  published in Journal of Management Education, Robert D. Marx of University of Massachusetts Amherst, Joseph E. Garcia of Western Washington University, D. Anthony Butterfield of University of Massachusetts Amherst, Jeffrey A. Kappen of Drake University, and Timonthy T. Baldwin of Indiana University compared 50 doctoral programs to better understand how the programs incorporate teaching preparation in their curriculum. Citing the increasing difficulty for graduates to pursue a career in business academia, as well as the negative impact underprepared professors have upon their students, the authors of this article make a compelling argument about why teaching preparation should be more central to business doctoral programs.

Classroom Business

The abstract:

In this essay, we explore why there has traditionally been so little emphasis on teaching preparation in business doctoral programs. Program administrators and faculty typically espouse support for teaching development; yet the existing reward systems are powerfully aligned in favor of a focus on research competency. Indeed, through the lens of a performance diagnostic model, it is entirely predictable that doctoral programs have not offered more teaching development opportunities, as administrators often do not have the requisite motivation, ability, opportunity, or resources to develop comparable teaching competence. However, given that the average graduate will take a professorial position with greater than 50% of responsibilities devoted to teaching, most external observers would conclude that there is a curious dearth of teaching preparation in contemporary business doctoral programs. However understandable the dearth of teaching development, we argue that those reasons are no longer acceptable, and the present essay is predominately a call for change. Suggestions for enhancing the depth and nature of teaching development are offered, and we include some examples of progressive initiatives underway in the hopes of provoking a more intense conversation on the teaching preparation of the next generation of business professors.

You can read “Isn’t It Time We Did Something About the Lack of Teaching Preparation in Business Doctoral Programs?” from Journal of Management Education free for the next two weeks by clicking here. Want to know about all the latest research from Journal of Management Education? Click here to sign up for e-alerts!

This entry was posted in Business, Education and tagged , , , , , by Cynthia Nalevanko, Editor, Management INK. Bookmark the permalink.

About Cynthia Nalevanko, Editor, Management INK

Founded in 1965, SAGE is the world’s leading independent academic and professional publisher. Known for our commitment to quality and innovation, SAGE has helped inform and educate a global community of scholars, practitioners, researchers, and students across a broad range of subject areas. With over 900 employees globally from principal offices in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, and Washington DC, our publishing programme includes more than 560 journals and over 800 books, reference works and databases a year in business, humanities, social sciences, science, technology and medicine. Believing passionately that engaged scholarship lies at the heart of any healthy society and that education is intrinsically valuable, SAGE aims to be the world’s leading independent academic and professional publisher. This means playing a creative role in society by disseminating teaching and research on a global scale, the cornerstones of which are good, long-term relationships, a focus on our markets, and an ability to combine quality and innovation. Leading authors, editors and societies should feel that SAGE is their natural home: we believe in meeting the range of their needs, and in publishing the best of their work. We are a growing company, and our financial success comes from thinking creatively about our markets and actively responding to the needs of our customers.

One thought on “Teaching Future Teachers: An Argument for Incorporating More Teaching Preparation in Business Doctoral Programs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s