Reflections on the Organization Studies’ Special Issue

[Business and Management INK would like to welcome Wendy K. Smith, Guest Editor for the Organization Studies‘ Special Issue: Paradox, Tensions and Dualities of Innovation and Change. Below, Dr. Smith reflects on the themes of the issue and her experience as a guest editor:]

OSSWhen I was a doctoral student, faculty and colleagues frequently tried to dissuade me from studying paradox. Only a small handful of scholars wrote about paradoxes, dialectics and dualities in organizations and management theory. Most academics believed these ideas belonged in philosophy classes or in yoga studios, but was too abstract and underspecified for organizational and management theory. Several senior colleagues confessed their long-standing intrigue with the idea, but noted that they abandoned efforts to publish paradox studies in their earlier years, given how hard it was to do.

Against this backdrop, I could not be more delighted when we ended up with 106 high quality submissions, the most received for a special issue to date for a special issue in Organizational Studies. Paradox, it seems, is no longer a peripheral theory or pet project reserved for the luxury of intrigued senior scholars. As an intellectual field, we have worked to increasing clarity to define and bound key constructs and propose and test critical relationships. At the same time, we have seen greater breadth applying paradox theory across levels of analysis, phenomena, and theory, ultimately acting more as a meta-theory.

The Organizational Studies Special Issue provide a great example of the convergence and divergence of the field. The nine papers in the special issue collectively describe paradox, dualities and dialectics as three constructs each depicted by both contradiction and interdependence. They also suggest divergence in the application of these concepts, drawing from an array of methodologies and explore insights across varied innovation and change phenomena, industries and geographies. Seven of the studies adopt inductive and qualitative methods, while one study applies an individual-level experimental research design, while another offers a theoretical argument. The studies also explore tensions in a wide range of phenomena, including senior leadership decision making, cross-sector collaborations, inter-professional collaborations, employee identification, and mergers and acquisitions. Moreover, they examine these issues in industries ranging from utilities, media and public services to health care and print. They further use data from China, India, Australia, the UK, and the US.

The field of paradox studies has progressed significantly over the last 20 years, becoming a more legitimacy theory with broad application. I look forward to the next chapter as the theory continues to grapple with increased complexity and opportunity.

You can read articles from the Special Issue: Paradox, Tensions and Dualities of Innovation and Change for the next 30 days free.

This entry was posted in Organizational Studies by Cynthia Nalevanko, Senior Editor, SAGE Publishing. Bookmark the permalink.

About Cynthia Nalevanko, Senior Editor, SAGE Publishing

Founded in 1965, SAGE is the world’s leading independent academic and professional publisher. Known for our commitment to quality and innovation, SAGE has helped inform and educate a global community of scholars, practitioners, researchers, and students across a broad range of subject areas. With over 1500 employees globally from principal offices in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, and Melburne, our publishing program includes more than 1000 journals and over 900 books, reference works and databases a year in business, humanities, social sciences, science, technology and medicine. Believing passionately that engaged scholarship lies at the heart of any healthy society and that education is intrinsically valuable, SAGE aims to be the world’s leading independent academic and professional publisher. This means playing a creative role in society by disseminating teaching and research on a global scale, the cornerstones of which are good, long-term relationships, a focus on our markets, and an ability to combine quality and innovation. Leading authors, editors and societies should feel that SAGE is their natural home: we believe in meeting the range of their needs, and in publishing the best of their work. We are a growing company, and our financial success comes from thinking creatively about our markets and actively responding to the needs of our customers.

2 thoughts on “Reflections on the Organization Studies’ Special Issue

  1. I am a long time follower of “Business and Management Ink”. I find that this forum often publicizes extremely interesting current and cutting edge research that often slides under the radar of most non-discipline specific scholars and practitioners. For me, this forum is often the only access I have to many topics – Organization Studies‘ Special Issue: Paradox, Tensions and Dualities of Innovation and Change being one of them. I always look forward to having open access to sources and articles which I would not otherwise have. For this I am very appreciative.

    Unfortunately, several times over the last few months BMI has advertised open access to certain articles and/or journals which were not in fact open access. This special issue of Organization Studies is an example. Simply an annoyance – but not enough to make me give up on BMI. I continue to appreciate all the genuinely interesting and intrihuing articles that you provide.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s