Exploring Status in Organization and Management Theory

How do scholars define status? Alessandro Piazza and Fabrizio Castellucci, both of Bocconi University, point out inhierarchy-96186_640 their article “Status in Organization and Management Theory”, published in the January issue of the Journal of Management, that its precise definition and its usage in empirical research have been the subject of much controversy. From the article:

“This topic is therefore ripe for a review article that is targeted at management scholars. In fact, while a few reviews exist (Chen et al., 2012; Jasso, 2001; Lin, 1999; Sauder et al., 2012), they mostly draw on research in sociology and are thus not intended for wide readership in jom coverour field. Moreover, none of these reviews has specifically attempted to highlight how and to what extent the status construct is relevant to the managerial literature. This is important because the theoretical perspectives employed in studies of status tend to vary to some extent across disciplines. Sociologists’ general view of the notion shows strong linkages with power (Bonacich, 1987), and it is applicable to a wide variety of social situations (Magee & Galinsky, 2008). Organization and management scholars tend to focus on a smaller situational subset—e.g., small groups, organizations, markets or other competitive environments— and do so with an eye to some sort of positive outcome a favorable status position might have for its holder (Malter, 2011b; Podolny, 1993; Stuart, Hoang, & Hybels, 1999).”

Read “Status in Organization and Management Theory” online in the Journal of ManagementTo keep up to date on more articles like this, sign up for e-alerts today by clicking here!

This entry was posted in Academy of Management, Income, Pay, Power, Social Issues and tagged , , , , by Cynthia Nalevanko, Editor, Management INK. Bookmark the permalink.

About Cynthia Nalevanko, Editor, Management INK

Founded in 1965, SAGE is the world’s leading independent academic and professional publisher. Known for our commitment to quality and innovation, SAGE has helped inform and educate a global community of scholars, practitioners, researchers, and students across a broad range of subject areas. With over 900 employees globally from principal offices in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, and Washington DC, our publishing programme includes more than 560 journals and over 800 books, reference works and databases a year in business, humanities, social sciences, science, technology and medicine. Believing passionately that engaged scholarship lies at the heart of any healthy society and that education is intrinsically valuable, SAGE aims to be the world’s leading independent academic and professional publisher. This means playing a creative role in society by disseminating teaching and research on a global scale, the cornerstones of which are good, long-term relationships, a focus on our markets, and an ability to combine quality and innovation. Leading authors, editors and societies should feel that SAGE is their natural home: we believe in meeting the range of their needs, and in publishing the best of their work. We are a growing company, and our financial success comes from thinking creatively about our markets and actively responding to the needs of our customers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s